Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement users are proud to face in solidarity because of the Occupy Wall Street motion sweeping the country.

The full time to use it has become. These vocations are a definite thing that is good. We truly need a lot more of them, and now we require guidelines and policies that provide everyday individuals.

PresВ­idential canВ­didates, including Barack Obama, needs to be expected tough concerns on the Iowa campaign path and so the country can discover exactly where the canВ­didates get up on bread and butter conditions that matВ­ter most to evВ­eryday individuals.

That’s precisely what people in Iowa Cit­i­zens for Community Improve­ment (CCI) did in the State Fair the other day whenever we asked Re­publican pres­idential can­didate Mitt Romney and Demo­crat­ic nationwide Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz the way they would strengthen personal Secu­rity, Medicare, and Med­icaid with­out cutting ben­efits, and work out Wall Street corporations spend their reasonable share of fees.

Romney’s head­line-grabbing quip — their as­sertion that “corporations are individuals, my friend” — had been like a start working the gut to an incredible number of ev­eryday individuals struggling when you look at the mid­dle of a good Re­ces­sion that was due to big bank and corporate greed.

Regard­less of just exactly what the Supreme Court claims about business person­hood, the declare that corporations are individuals with inher­ent peoples liberties fails the test that is common-sense goes against ev­eryday people’s ba­sic notions of de­cency loan payday lender Louisiana, equality and fairness.

But all of the con­tro­ver­sy surrounding Romney’s re­mark obscured Romney’s real pol­icy propos­als. Whenever a re­tired teach­er from Diverses Moines asked Romney if he support­ed scrapping the Social Secu­rity payroll income tax limit, Romney reacted by saying he supports “progressive cost indexing” for Social Secu­rity and a “high­er re­tire­ment age” for personal Secu­rity and Medicare.

TransВ­lated into EnВ­glish, this means Romney desires to cut benВ­efits for Iowa seВ­niors, a known fact which also should are making headВ­lines.

AnВ­othВ­er misВ­sed headВ­line: a lot of Democrats would also like to cut personal SecuВ­rity, Medicare and MedВ­icaid as opposed to make big corporations while the super-wealthy pay their fair share.

Af­ter Romney’s “corporations are people” gaffe, Wasserman Schultz ended up being fast to issue a state­ment stating that Romney while the GOP are push­ing policies that put corporate inter­ests prior to the typical good. But Wasserman Schultz, a con­gresswoman from Florida, really voted when it comes to bad financial obligation ceiling deal that cuts trillions in investing with­out any guar­anteed new rev­enues and sets up a “super-committee” with a mandate to cut personal Secu­rity, Medicare and Med­icaid ben­efits. Pres­ident Obama had been the Demo­crat whom signed the bad deal into legislation.

That’s why CCI users also asked Wasserman Schultz questions that are tough hawaii Fair. Al­though the Demo­crat­ic Party has already been rais­ing mon­ey with a brand new TV advertisement tar­geting Romney and his “corporations are individuals” line, truth be told that the Demo­crat­ic Party all too of­ten adopts populist rhetoric while push­ing exactly the same pro-corporate policies since the GOP.

Whenever we attempted to ask Wasserman Schultz to clar­ify her — and Pres­ident Obama’s — po­sition about this problem, she lit­erally went far from the concerns as opposed to respond to them. At least Romney en­gaged when you look at the demo­crat­ic process, encountered tough concerns and endured their ground.

Pres­idential can­didates and oth­er leaders from both po­lit­ical parties — including the pres­ident — need to find out they can expect tough concerns from the Iowa campaign trail and therefore ev­eryday Iowans will hold them account­able with their responses. They should be called out if they don’t answer clearly or hon­estly.

There’s too much on the line in 2010 to try out “Iowa good” and let the can­didates have actually their picture ops and present their stump speeches with­out be­ing chal­lenged from the things that re­ally mat­ter — like the way they intend to split down on Wall Street greed and begin placing communities before corporations and individuals before prof­its.

---